Smuggler’s Paradise: Guns, Drugs and Violence in the Southwest, Part 1 of 2
  By David Holthouse   PHOENIX, Ariz.–The endless carnage of the Mexican cartel wars may  seem a world away from the climate control and free Starbucks within the  Phoenix Convention Center, where leading border security experts  gathered this month for the fifth annual Border Security Expo. Yet it’s  only 150 miles from downtown Phoenix to the northernmost cartel war zone  of Nogales, Sonora. Even closer are the badlands on the U.S. side of  the border where last December a Border Patrol agent was killed in a  firefight with Mexican drug smugglers. They were armed with AK-47s  purchased legally from a gun store in Glendale, Arizona, less than a  year before.    Weapons seized in March 2010 by Mexican military police from La Familia  Michoacana Cartel, more commonly known as La Familia, a Mexican drug  trafficking organization and criminal syndicate.   More than 73,000 firearms have been seized in drug raids or recovered from the scenes of cartel gun battles in Mexico since December 2006. According to law enforcement officials,  “90 percent of the weapons that could be traced were determined to have  originated from various sources within the U.S.” Weapons sold  over-the-counter in the U.S., including thousands of cheap,  military-style assault rifles, are being used in Mexico to commit  horrific violence on a massive scale.   Conservative politicians routinely demand that the federal government to  do more to secure the border — often championing nativist and  draconian anti-immigrant policies. Yet they reflexively oppose even  modest efforts by law enforcement to better track the flow of high-powered  weaponry.   Meanwhile, the violence in Mexico continues to escalate. More than  34,000 people have died in the cartel wars since late 2006, many of them  law enforcement officers, elected officials, or innocent civilians. On February 15, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent was shot and killed  and his partner was seriously wounded while they were investigating  cartel gunrunning in Mexico.   That same day marked the start of the Border Security Expo,  a gathering of law enforcement and government officials from the U.S.  and Mexico, as well as private security and defense contractors.   Standing at the Phoenix conference hall podium, U.S. border security  expert Alonzo Peña, the former Deputy Director of ICE, called for  America to own up to its responsibility for the bloodshed in Mexico.   “We are the consumers of the drugs and we are the suppliers of the  weapons,” said Peña. “The drugs come to America, the money and the guns  go back. U.S. weapons are giving these cartels the firepower they need.  Much more needs to be done. There is a huge gap between what we are  capable of doing to stop illegal gun trafficking to Mexico and what is  actually being done.”   Last spring, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms proposed to  narrow that gap with an emergency regulation that would require the  roughly 8,500 federally licensed firearms dealers in the four border  states to report the sale of multiple assault rifles to the same person  in any five-day period.   This proposed new measure would neither prevent nor delay the  purchase of any firearms. It’s designed to thwart the common practice  among gunrunners of deploying “straw purchasers” to buy assault rifles  in bulk. The proposed regulation mirrors a law on handguns that has been  on the books since 1993, requiring gun stores to notify law enforcement  authorities whenever a person buys two or more handguns in the same  week.
  Weapons seized in March 2010 by Mexican military police from La Familia  Michoacana Cartel, more commonly known as La Familia, a Mexican drug  trafficking organization and criminal syndicate.   More than 73,000 firearms have been seized in drug raids or recovered from the scenes of cartel gun battles in Mexico since December 2006. According to law enforcement officials,  “90 percent of the weapons that could be traced were determined to have  originated from various sources within the U.S.” Weapons sold  over-the-counter in the U.S., including thousands of cheap,  military-style assault rifles, are being used in Mexico to commit  horrific violence on a massive scale.   Conservative politicians routinely demand that the federal government to  do more to secure the border — often championing nativist and  draconian anti-immigrant policies. Yet they reflexively oppose even  modest efforts by law enforcement to better track the flow of high-powered  weaponry.   Meanwhile, the violence in Mexico continues to escalate. More than  34,000 people have died in the cartel wars since late 2006, many of them  law enforcement officers, elected officials, or innocent civilians. On February 15, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent was shot and killed  and his partner was seriously wounded while they were investigating  cartel gunrunning in Mexico.   That same day marked the start of the Border Security Expo,  a gathering of law enforcement and government officials from the U.S.  and Mexico, as well as private security and defense contractors.   Standing at the Phoenix conference hall podium, U.S. border security  expert Alonzo Peña, the former Deputy Director of ICE, called for  America to own up to its responsibility for the bloodshed in Mexico.   “We are the consumers of the drugs and we are the suppliers of the  weapons,” said Peña. “The drugs come to America, the money and the guns  go back. U.S. weapons are giving these cartels the firepower they need.  Much more needs to be done. There is a huge gap between what we are  capable of doing to stop illegal gun trafficking to Mexico and what is  actually being done.”   Last spring, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms proposed to  narrow that gap with an emergency regulation that would require the  roughly 8,500 federally licensed firearms dealers in the four border  states to report the sale of multiple assault rifles to the same person  in any five-day period.   This proposed new measure would neither prevent nor delay the  purchase of any firearms. It’s designed to thwart the common practice  among gunrunners of deploying “straw purchasers” to buy assault rifles  in bulk. The proposed regulation mirrors a law on handguns that has been  on the books since 1993, requiring gun stores to notify law enforcement  authorities whenever a person buys two or more handguns in the same  week.    High-powered assault rifles confiscated by Mexican soldiers in June 2009 from the Tijuana Cartel.   The recent indictment of 17 alleged  gunrunners in Phoenix details the kind of buying patterns the proposed  regulation targets. According to the indictment, Uriel Patino, a legal  resident of the U.S., paid cash last Nov. 3 for two AK-47 rifles from  Lone Wolf Trading Co., a Glendale, Ariz. strip mall gun store. A week  later, he came back and bought 10 more AK-47s. Two days later, he  purchased five more AKs. A month after that, he bought 20 more. In all,  he bought 232 weapons — 42 handguns and 190 assault rifles — all from  the same store, in 18 visits. With each purchase, Patino passed an  instant background check and signed a form attesting the firearms were  for his personal use.   His claims were no more ridiculous than the National Rifle Association and other gun lobby groups portraying the  proposed anti-gunrunning measure as a serious attack on the second  amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. But that is just what they  did.   “This administration does not have the guts to build a wall, but they  do have the audacity to blame and register gun owners for Mexico’s  problems,” said Chris Cox, the chief lobbyist for the NRA.   Facing stiff opposition from the NRA and its allies, President Obama  repeatedly delayed approval of the emergency regulation. Now it may be  too late. Last Friday–three days after the ICE agent was murdered in  Mexico–the House of Representatives voted 277 to 149 to block the Obama  administration from implementing the anti-gunrunning regulation.   Two years ago, a Department of Defense study concluded  that cartel violence had destabilized Mexico to a point that it was at  risk of becoming a failed state, meaning a total collapse of its  civilian government.   But when the U.S. law enforcement professionals who are tasked with  securing the border ask for commonsense firearms regulations to stem the  flow of high-powered weapons to Mexican drug cartels, right-wing forces  put the interests of the firearms industry above those of national  security and federal law enforcement officials in both nations.   “We are being outgunned,” said Luis Carlos Nujera, the State  Secretary of the Department of Public Safety in the state of Jalisco,  whose capital, Guadalajara, erupted in violence in early February after  two cartel leaders were arrested.  ”The aim of the cartels is to  destabilize and create panic. To do this they are using better and more  modern firearms than many of our state and local police agencies  possess.”   At the Border Security Expo, ATF officials made it clear that  interdicting firearms bound for Mexico is a top enforcement priority for  their agency. “We have ‘Project Gunrunner’ groups in Phoenix and Tucson  that were created specifically to address the gun trafficking that  directly impacts the level of violence in Mexico and the U.S. border  region,” said James Needles, the Acting Special Agent in Charge of the  Phoenix Field Division of the ATF.   Needles said that in May, the ATF will open a new anti-gunrunning  office with seven agents in Sierra Vista, Ariz., just north of the  border. “We’re going after the Arizona-based distribution cells,” said  Needles. “The street agents know what’s needed. Our biggest hurdle is  Washington.”   In the 48 hours after the House of Representatives voted to block the anti-gunrunning regulation, more than 40 people were  killed in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, a border city about the size of San  Antonio, Texas. Among the dead were four Mexican police officers, shot  down with assault rifles.   Originally published at Media Matters for America at  http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102250023   David Holthouse is an investigative journalist with Media Matters for America who lives in Alaska. His  work has appeared in Rolling Stone, The Nation, American Prospect, and  other publications.
  High-powered assault rifles confiscated by Mexican soldiers in June 2009 from the Tijuana Cartel.   The recent indictment of 17 alleged  gunrunners in Phoenix details the kind of buying patterns the proposed  regulation targets. According to the indictment, Uriel Patino, a legal  resident of the U.S., paid cash last Nov. 3 for two AK-47 rifles from  Lone Wolf Trading Co., a Glendale, Ariz. strip mall gun store. A week  later, he came back and bought 10 more AK-47s. Two days later, he  purchased five more AKs. A month after that, he bought 20 more. In all,  he bought 232 weapons — 42 handguns and 190 assault rifles — all from  the same store, in 18 visits. With each purchase, Patino passed an  instant background check and signed a form attesting the firearms were  for his personal use.   His claims were no more ridiculous than the National Rifle Association and other gun lobby groups portraying the  proposed anti-gunrunning measure as a serious attack on the second  amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. But that is just what they  did.   “This administration does not have the guts to build a wall, but they  do have the audacity to blame and register gun owners for Mexico’s  problems,” said Chris Cox, the chief lobbyist for the NRA.   Facing stiff opposition from the NRA and its allies, President Obama  repeatedly delayed approval of the emergency regulation. Now it may be  too late. Last Friday–three days after the ICE agent was murdered in  Mexico–the House of Representatives voted 277 to 149 to block the Obama  administration from implementing the anti-gunrunning regulation.   Two years ago, a Department of Defense study concluded  that cartel violence had destabilized Mexico to a point that it was at  risk of becoming a failed state, meaning a total collapse of its  civilian government.   But when the U.S. law enforcement professionals who are tasked with  securing the border ask for commonsense firearms regulations to stem the  flow of high-powered weapons to Mexican drug cartels, right-wing forces  put the interests of the firearms industry above those of national  security and federal law enforcement officials in both nations.   “We are being outgunned,” said Luis Carlos Nujera, the State  Secretary of the Department of Public Safety in the state of Jalisco,  whose capital, Guadalajara, erupted in violence in early February after  two cartel leaders were arrested.  ”The aim of the cartels is to  destabilize and create panic. To do this they are using better and more  modern firearms than many of our state and local police agencies  possess.”   At the Border Security Expo, ATF officials made it clear that  interdicting firearms bound for Mexico is a top enforcement priority for  their agency. “We have ‘Project Gunrunner’ groups in Phoenix and Tucson  that were created specifically to address the gun trafficking that  directly impacts the level of violence in Mexico and the U.S. border  region,” said James Needles, the Acting Special Agent in Charge of the  Phoenix Field Division of the ATF.   Needles said that in May, the ATF will open a new anti-gunrunning  office with seven agents in Sierra Vista, Ariz., just north of the  border. “We’re going after the Arizona-based distribution cells,” said  Needles. “The street agents know what’s needed. Our biggest hurdle is  Washington.”   In the 48 hours after the House of Representatives voted to block the anti-gunrunning regulation, more than 40 people were  killed in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, a border city about the size of San  Antonio, Texas. Among the dead were four Mexican police officers, shot  down with assault rifles.   Originally published at Media Matters for America at  http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102250023   David Holthouse is an investigative journalist with Media Matters for America who lives in Alaska. His  work has appeared in Rolling Stone, The Nation, American Prospect, and  other publications.  
 Weapons seized in March 2010 by Mexican military police from La Familia  Michoacana Cartel, more commonly known as La Familia, a Mexican drug  trafficking organization and criminal syndicate.   More than 73,000 firearms have been seized in drug raids or recovered from the scenes of cartel gun battles in Mexico since December 2006. According to law enforcement officials,  “90 percent of the weapons that could be traced were determined to have  originated from various sources within the U.S.” Weapons sold  over-the-counter in the U.S., including thousands of cheap,  military-style assault rifles, are being used in Mexico to commit  horrific violence on a massive scale.   Conservative politicians routinely demand that the federal government to  do more to secure the border — often championing nativist and  draconian anti-immigrant policies. Yet they reflexively oppose even  modest efforts by law enforcement to better track the flow of high-powered  weaponry.   Meanwhile, the violence in Mexico continues to escalate. More than  34,000 people have died in the cartel wars since late 2006, many of them  law enforcement officers, elected officials, or innocent civilians. On February 15, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent was shot and killed  and his partner was seriously wounded while they were investigating  cartel gunrunning in Mexico.   That same day marked the start of the Border Security Expo,  a gathering of law enforcement and government officials from the U.S.  and Mexico, as well as private security and defense contractors.   Standing at the Phoenix conference hall podium, U.S. border security  expert Alonzo Peña, the former Deputy Director of ICE, called for  America to own up to its responsibility for the bloodshed in Mexico.   “We are the consumers of the drugs and we are the suppliers of the  weapons,” said Peña. “The drugs come to America, the money and the guns  go back. U.S. weapons are giving these cartels the firepower they need.  Much more needs to be done. There is a huge gap between what we are  capable of doing to stop illegal gun trafficking to Mexico and what is  actually being done.”   Last spring, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms proposed to  narrow that gap with an emergency regulation that would require the  roughly 8,500 federally licensed firearms dealers in the four border  states to report the sale of multiple assault rifles to the same person  in any five-day period.   This proposed new measure would neither prevent nor delay the  purchase of any firearms. It’s designed to thwart the common practice  among gunrunners of deploying “straw purchasers” to buy assault rifles  in bulk. The proposed regulation mirrors a law on handguns that has been  on the books since 1993, requiring gun stores to notify law enforcement  authorities whenever a person buys two or more handguns in the same  week.
  Weapons seized in March 2010 by Mexican military police from La Familia  Michoacana Cartel, more commonly known as La Familia, a Mexican drug  trafficking organization and criminal syndicate.   More than 73,000 firearms have been seized in drug raids or recovered from the scenes of cartel gun battles in Mexico since December 2006. According to law enforcement officials,  “90 percent of the weapons that could be traced were determined to have  originated from various sources within the U.S.” Weapons sold  over-the-counter in the U.S., including thousands of cheap,  military-style assault rifles, are being used in Mexico to commit  horrific violence on a massive scale.   Conservative politicians routinely demand that the federal government to  do more to secure the border — often championing nativist and  draconian anti-immigrant policies. Yet they reflexively oppose even  modest efforts by law enforcement to better track the flow of high-powered  weaponry.   Meanwhile, the violence in Mexico continues to escalate. More than  34,000 people have died in the cartel wars since late 2006, many of them  law enforcement officers, elected officials, or innocent civilians. On February 15, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent was shot and killed  and his partner was seriously wounded while they were investigating  cartel gunrunning in Mexico.   That same day marked the start of the Border Security Expo,  a gathering of law enforcement and government officials from the U.S.  and Mexico, as well as private security and defense contractors.   Standing at the Phoenix conference hall podium, U.S. border security  expert Alonzo Peña, the former Deputy Director of ICE, called for  America to own up to its responsibility for the bloodshed in Mexico.   “We are the consumers of the drugs and we are the suppliers of the  weapons,” said Peña. “The drugs come to America, the money and the guns  go back. U.S. weapons are giving these cartels the firepower they need.  Much more needs to be done. There is a huge gap between what we are  capable of doing to stop illegal gun trafficking to Mexico and what is  actually being done.”   Last spring, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms proposed to  narrow that gap with an emergency regulation that would require the  roughly 8,500 federally licensed firearms dealers in the four border  states to report the sale of multiple assault rifles to the same person  in any five-day period.   This proposed new measure would neither prevent nor delay the  purchase of any firearms. It’s designed to thwart the common practice  among gunrunners of deploying “straw purchasers” to buy assault rifles  in bulk. The proposed regulation mirrors a law on handguns that has been  on the books since 1993, requiring gun stores to notify law enforcement  authorities whenever a person buys two or more handguns in the same  week.    High-powered assault rifles confiscated by Mexican soldiers in June 2009 from the Tijuana Cartel.   The recent indictment of 17 alleged  gunrunners in Phoenix details the kind of buying patterns the proposed  regulation targets. According to the indictment, Uriel Patino, a legal  resident of the U.S., paid cash last Nov. 3 for two AK-47 rifles from  Lone Wolf Trading Co., a Glendale, Ariz. strip mall gun store. A week  later, he came back and bought 10 more AK-47s. Two days later, he  purchased five more AKs. A month after that, he bought 20 more. In all,  he bought 232 weapons — 42 handguns and 190 assault rifles — all from  the same store, in 18 visits. With each purchase, Patino passed an  instant background check and signed a form attesting the firearms were  for his personal use.   His claims were no more ridiculous than the National Rifle Association and other gun lobby groups portraying the  proposed anti-gunrunning measure as a serious attack on the second  amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. But that is just what they  did.   “This administration does not have the guts to build a wall, but they  do have the audacity to blame and register gun owners for Mexico’s  problems,” said Chris Cox, the chief lobbyist for the NRA.   Facing stiff opposition from the NRA and its allies, President Obama  repeatedly delayed approval of the emergency regulation. Now it may be  too late. Last Friday–three days after the ICE agent was murdered in  Mexico–the House of Representatives voted 277 to 149 to block the Obama  administration from implementing the anti-gunrunning regulation.   Two years ago, a Department of Defense study concluded  that cartel violence had destabilized Mexico to a point that it was at  risk of becoming a failed state, meaning a total collapse of its  civilian government.   But when the U.S. law enforcement professionals who are tasked with  securing the border ask for commonsense firearms regulations to stem the  flow of high-powered weapons to Mexican drug cartels, right-wing forces  put the interests of the firearms industry above those of national  security and federal law enforcement officials in both nations.   “We are being outgunned,” said Luis Carlos Nujera, the State  Secretary of the Department of Public Safety in the state of Jalisco,  whose capital, Guadalajara, erupted in violence in early February after  two cartel leaders were arrested.  ”The aim of the cartels is to  destabilize and create panic. To do this they are using better and more  modern firearms than many of our state and local police agencies  possess.”   At the Border Security Expo, ATF officials made it clear that  interdicting firearms bound for Mexico is a top enforcement priority for  their agency. “We have ‘Project Gunrunner’ groups in Phoenix and Tucson  that were created specifically to address the gun trafficking that  directly impacts the level of violence in Mexico and the U.S. border  region,” said James Needles, the Acting Special Agent in Charge of the  Phoenix Field Division of the ATF.   Needles said that in May, the ATF will open a new anti-gunrunning  office with seven agents in Sierra Vista, Ariz., just north of the  border. “We’re going after the Arizona-based distribution cells,” said  Needles. “The street agents know what’s needed. Our biggest hurdle is  Washington.”   In the 48 hours after the House of Representatives voted to block the anti-gunrunning regulation, more than 40 people were  killed in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, a border city about the size of San  Antonio, Texas. Among the dead were four Mexican police officers, shot  down with assault rifles.   Originally published at Media Matters for America at  http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102250023   David Holthouse is an investigative journalist with Media Matters for America who lives in Alaska. His  work has appeared in Rolling Stone, The Nation, American Prospect, and  other publications.
  High-powered assault rifles confiscated by Mexican soldiers in June 2009 from the Tijuana Cartel.   The recent indictment of 17 alleged  gunrunners in Phoenix details the kind of buying patterns the proposed  regulation targets. According to the indictment, Uriel Patino, a legal  resident of the U.S., paid cash last Nov. 3 for two AK-47 rifles from  Lone Wolf Trading Co., a Glendale, Ariz. strip mall gun store. A week  later, he came back and bought 10 more AK-47s. Two days later, he  purchased five more AKs. A month after that, he bought 20 more. In all,  he bought 232 weapons — 42 handguns and 190 assault rifles — all from  the same store, in 18 visits. With each purchase, Patino passed an  instant background check and signed a form attesting the firearms were  for his personal use.   His claims were no more ridiculous than the National Rifle Association and other gun lobby groups portraying the  proposed anti-gunrunning measure as a serious attack on the second  amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. But that is just what they  did.   “This administration does not have the guts to build a wall, but they  do have the audacity to blame and register gun owners for Mexico’s  problems,” said Chris Cox, the chief lobbyist for the NRA.   Facing stiff opposition from the NRA and its allies, President Obama  repeatedly delayed approval of the emergency regulation. Now it may be  too late. Last Friday–three days after the ICE agent was murdered in  Mexico–the House of Representatives voted 277 to 149 to block the Obama  administration from implementing the anti-gunrunning regulation.   Two years ago, a Department of Defense study concluded  that cartel violence had destabilized Mexico to a point that it was at  risk of becoming a failed state, meaning a total collapse of its  civilian government.   But when the U.S. law enforcement professionals who are tasked with  securing the border ask for commonsense firearms regulations to stem the  flow of high-powered weapons to Mexican drug cartels, right-wing forces  put the interests of the firearms industry above those of national  security and federal law enforcement officials in both nations.   “We are being outgunned,” said Luis Carlos Nujera, the State  Secretary of the Department of Public Safety in the state of Jalisco,  whose capital, Guadalajara, erupted in violence in early February after  two cartel leaders were arrested.  ”The aim of the cartels is to  destabilize and create panic. To do this they are using better and more  modern firearms than many of our state and local police agencies  possess.”   At the Border Security Expo, ATF officials made it clear that  interdicting firearms bound for Mexico is a top enforcement priority for  their agency. “We have ‘Project Gunrunner’ groups in Phoenix and Tucson  that were created specifically to address the gun trafficking that  directly impacts the level of violence in Mexico and the U.S. border  region,” said James Needles, the Acting Special Agent in Charge of the  Phoenix Field Division of the ATF.   Needles said that in May, the ATF will open a new anti-gunrunning  office with seven agents in Sierra Vista, Ariz., just north of the  border. “We’re going after the Arizona-based distribution cells,” said  Needles. “The street agents know what’s needed. Our biggest hurdle is  Washington.”   In the 48 hours after the House of Representatives voted to block the anti-gunrunning regulation, more than 40 people were  killed in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, a border city about the size of San  Antonio, Texas. Among the dead were four Mexican police officers, shot  down with assault rifles.   Originally published at Media Matters for America at  http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102250023   David Holthouse is an investigative journalist with Media Matters for America who lives in Alaska. His  work has appeared in Rolling Stone, The Nation, American Prospect, and  other publications.