The Cain Episode Reminds Us – Republicans Play A Different Game.

Yesterday Dave wrote an insightful post about the Herman Cain media blow up on harassment claims. He’s dead on with his analysis.

But there is one thought I would add to the debate over the issue and the coverage of the issue. The Republicans flat out play a different game. And, as a Democrat who has worked on two Presidential Campaigns, here’s why it matters.

A Democrat would have never done this. First, they would have debated about whether the original harassment claims were valid. Then they would have worried about getting found out as the leak behind the story. Then they would have worried about the impact on the women in the original claim. And the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace in general.

Then they would have worried that once, somewhere, a Democrat was accused of the same thing and how can they possibly bring this up in case someone says well, fifteen years ago, what about Bill Clinton?

So they would have passed. They would have let the story go and gone on to attack what some genius in Washington thinks is Cain’s real weakness and that is issues within his tax plan.

Republicans? No way. This was a way to derail a potential frontrunner and the facts, the ethics, the potential cross claims be dammed. Shoot first. Ask questions later.

In fact, this small example is part of the reason this site exists. The Republican Strategists, the men and women who sell tobacco as part of a healthy outdoor lifestyle, do you really think that the chance that Cain might not have actually done anything would bother them? Or that it could cause terrible trauma to the women involved? No, this is a business and the ends justify the means.

The press coverage on the Right also proved this. People who pay attention think it’s hypocrisy, it’s not. It’s just you have to put yourself in a reverse enlightment, a place where facts don’t matter. And then it’s easy to call Politico the main stream media and describe this as a “high tech lynching” by Democrats. It’s laughable, if it wasn’t so effective.

Democrats, you want as friends. Republicans? Watch Cain fall now and you’ll realize. You want those bastards running your campaign.

1 comment on this post.
  1. Eyesbright:

    I find the timing awfully coincidental, coming only a few days after Michelle Bachmann was told, supposedly by the TeaBaggers, to end her campaign. “TeaBaggers”, of course, means Dick Armey/Grover Norquist/the Koch Brothers, etc., ad nauseum. My feeling is that the Republican Powers That Be are ready to winnow the field, so that the money can be concentrated toward the candidate(s) they’ve picked as most easily manipulated. I’ve said since day one that they’ve picked Mitt Romney as their boy. Rick Perry is second choice but I think they put him up for public view to see if Americans had such short memories as to even entertain the possibility of Bush-lite. Even in this field of mental lightweights, Perry is proving to be a failure via his blatant brainlessness and will only be allowed to remain so that TeaBaggers can ‘think’ they have a choice. Mitt will be the nominee because he’s a member of the “club.”